Talk:Lycoris (company)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article, though not very interesting, is very important because it adds to other articles that talk about Linux systems. This article is about one of the types (among hundreds) of Linux environment and it defines what Lycoris stands for. If you remove this some information in other articles may go unexplained.

Baranmatej 22:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

notability

The notability of Lycoris is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for companies, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage about the firm, or books in which the firm is mentioned.

Altrenatively, the article might be merged intp notable topics. It was in fact proposed to merge the article into Mandriva, but the discussion resulted in no consensus.

If you can, please add secondary sources to this article in order to establish notability. Otherwise, it might be deleted from Wikipedia.

For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 13:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Cheek was never employed by Microsoft, he was employed by a contract agency and contracted to Microsoft as a test engineer.

Notability may be substantiated by the fact that this company's product is in the critical path of a current product on http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Image:LinuxDistroTimeline.png. Nova SS 18:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

past tense?

This article is written in past tense but does not say anything about if the company stopped and wheter the linux version still exists or not. Can someone who knows about this improve it? Spot6224 (talk) 18:17, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lycoris (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20070810112018/http://distrowatch.lafox.net/table.php?distribution=lycoris to http://distrowatch.lafox.net/table.php?distribution=lycoris

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]