Talk:Lodestar (band)
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Review
[edit]This section moved from main article due to POV: Musically it's a very eclectic bag. Opener "Another Day" kicks the album off in fine form with a taut & driving metal riff and soaring Maynard James Keenanesque vocals; a fantastic start but by track 2 there's the first of a myriad of twist and turns that punctuate the album, keeping it interesting without ever losing momentum. The track in question is "Salter's Duck", a brooding blast of Hip Hop with megaphone vocals and some vicious guitar leads that transcend the current, and somewhat restrictive, nu/rap metal formula. "Wait a Minute" is next up and is probably the closest thing to a single on the album, all anthemic choruses and loud-quiet-loud guitars. It seems Lodestar are determined never to sit still and every song has its own identity, you'll find heavy metal, rap, funk, blues, classic rock, and outright wierdery all present and correct here and strung together seamlessly by some exemplary musicianship. A special mention should go to album closer "Iliac Crest", which seeps out of the speakers on a loping bass riff and builds, with the aid of strings, drums and eventually buzz saw guitars into an absolute monster, that recalls Janes Addiction being molested by Trent Reznor while "Opiate" era Tool stand by and throw bricks at them. I can't help but think that in the current rock friendly climate Lodestar would fare far better than they did back in '96 when this was released, but at least they left us with this as a reminder of just how inspiring and pant wettingly exciting music can, and should, be.
Fair use rationale for Image:Lodestaranotherday.jpg
[edit]Image:Lodestaranotherday.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Lodestardowninthemud.jpg
[edit]Image:Lodestardowninthemud.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Lodestarlodestar.jpg
[edit]Image:Lodestarlodestar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Recordings released by A&M?
[edit]If Lodestar released an album (Lodestar, 1996) and an EP (Down In The Mud, 1997) on A&M, then they qualify as notable according to WP:Notability (music). But, I find conflicting information on this. I added these attributions to the page, based on information at discogs.com; however, On A&M Records does not show any recordings by Lodestar. They do include Senser, but only from 1993-1996, so I doubt any Lodestar records got miscataloged. Does anybody have verification from a reliable source that Lodestar actually released these recording on the A&M label? I don't think discogs.com or On A&M necessarily count as reliable sources, and I can't find Lodestar at the Interscope, Universal Music Group, or A&M-Octone web pages, at the A&M archives at the UCLA library, or documentation of the relationship in any books I've consulted. Cnilep (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lodestar (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051220145524/http://www.ultimate-records.co.uk/ to http://www.ultimate-records.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)