This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
A lot of this page is PoV and needs some work to align it to Wikipedia's values. Added a PoV check to begin the process. Apistogramma 18:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
A lot more work is needed to make thise a reasonable Wikipedia article. Apistogramma19:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a reason why the Institute of Ideas article now links to here? I haven't been able to find much on wikipedia, but through archive.org, I can see there was once a stub and the beginnings of an article on the IOI. It seems strange to me that what an increasingly prominent think tank with frequent debates and events is represented on wikipedia by an almost-irrelevant article on a ~20-year defunct magazine.
If there is no reason why there is not a more expansive article on the institute of ideas, I might begin one in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.154.197.10 (talk) 10:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why was this, as far I can see, basically classically liberal journal called ‘Marxist’? The relationships between it and Marxism should be explained. WisDom-UK (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm perplexed as to why you're confused it has Marxist in the title; the first sentence of this article tells us that it was the journal of the Revolutionary Communist Party. What other relationship between the journal and Marxism are you thinking of? --Mondodi (talk) 04:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]