Talk:Liverpool Empire Theatre

Merseyside Mid‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Neoclassicism#In architecture and in the decorative and visual arts|Louis XVI style]] The anchor (#In architecture and in the decorative and visual arts) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Developer's puff?

The last paragraph of the article looks like developer's puff - is there someone with a knowledge of the building who can re-write this from a neutral POV? DavidFarmbrough 11:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked and there is a problem with this – A great deal of the article is plagiarised from the Liverpool Empire corporate website: [1] . Looks like User:Modernmillie lifted the text for this wholesale in his first edit of 25th June 2006. A look at his talk page shows he did this for several other theatres and has been taken to task.

I shall revert to the last edit before modern Millie's intervention and see if I can incorporate the latest edits not from a copyrighted source. The link to the corporate site is still there, if people want to see it. Removing this stuff will not only take away the copyright problem, but also remove the bias. DavidFarmbrough 11:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool Empire Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726211824/http://www.liverpoolworldheritage.com/visitingthewhs/areas/williambrownstreet/index.asp to http://www.liverpoolworldheritage.com/visitingthewhs/areas/williambrownstreet/index.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool Empire Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]