Talk:List of star systems within 75–80 light-years

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

August 2021

I don't know why, but when I run a simple query for all instances of subclasses of star systems between 75 and 80 light years from earth, I get a somewhat different list. http://w.wiki/3wR5 Vexations (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns on accuracy

There seems to be a systematic error affecting some, but not all, of the stars in the list.

Having made the HD 127334 article, I noticed some inconsistencies between the list entry and some published literature: this paper states that it is a G-type star without any known planets, whereas the old version of this article listed it as a K-type star with one exoplanet. The brightness and distance were also inaccurate. Furthermore, the SIMBAD entry for HD 169009 shows it's a blue giant (B9III) located some 400 ly away (calculated from parallax), rather than a G-dwarf 76 ly away (as such, I removed the object from the list). Perhaps there are more stars with entirely wrong information in this list, or some that shouldn't be included here at all.

I assume someone mistakenly took data from the wrong stars, in which case I have no clue where they originated from (as the two I found lacked citations), or what stars they were meant to represent. I would appreciate any info/help regarding this issue. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 09:03, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]