Talk:List of mountain peaks of California
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
[edit]Great list! And someone finally figured out how to directly link to NGS datasheets: THANK YOU!
Shouldn't this article (and similar ones) be named List of mountains in California ? hike395 05:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- This article contains four sortable tables of mountain peaks. List articles should ideally contain a single ordered list with perhaps some annotation. --Buaidh 17:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Mammoth Mountain
[edit]Great list but it is missing Mammoth Mountain, which should be both in elevation at 11.053 ft. and prominence at about 3.000 ft.
- Thanks, good catch. Mammoth Mountain should be #29 on the elevation list, although it misses the prominence and isolation lists. Yours aye, Buaidh 15:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of mountain peaks of California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Mokelumne Peak
[edit]How come Mokelumne Peak seems to be completely missing from WP? Not "major" somehow? Dicklyon (talk) 04:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
OK, now it's a "sub-stub". Good start. Thanks. Dicklyon (talk) 05:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
New York Mountain is in Colorado
[edit]New York Mountain is on the list but it is in Colorado. It's currently listed as #31 under, "The 50 most topographically prominent summits of California" http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/New_York_Mountain 2600:1700:7A51:10B0:B13E:688C:D8C2:A5D5 (talk) 15:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Indigenous names
[edit]Hi, I'd like to create a new column that includes the indigenous names of peaks and its corresponding tribe when not identified as such. This could be notated as such:
Rank | Mountain peak | Indigenous name | Mountain range | Elevation | Etc.... |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mount Whitney | Tumanguya (Paiute) | Sierra Nevada | 14,505 ft | etc |
Missing Mt Muir
[edit]Mount Muir is missing from the list. I'm not certain if this is deliberate or not, but Muir is a distinct separate summit nearly a mile south of Mount Whitney, and it is over 14,000 feet. Seems like it should be here. Lizardite (talk) 18:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- To be on the list, a peak must have at least 500m of topographic prominence. Mount Muir has 91m. — hike395 (talk) 13:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- List-Class California articles
- High-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- List-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- List-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- List-Class Mountain articles
- Mid-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- List-Class geography articles
- Mid-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles