Talk:List of large sailing yachts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Sailing Low‑importance

	List of large sailing yachts is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disclosed buildlist >110ft

110ft Frères Garcia (Gilles Vaton Poil de Carotte, France 2006) - bare hull only, never fitted out
120ft H2X (Gilles Vaton Nahema, France 2008) - mould only, never built
121ft Baltic Yachts (Malcolm McKeon, Finland 2026)
123ft H.M.S. Daedalus/Pendennis (Rob Humphreys sistership to Archelon, England 2020)
128ft Nautor Swan (German Frers, Finland 2025)
133ft Solombala (GL Watson Britannia, Russia 2009) - fitted out, never rigged
137ft Conrad Shipyard (Frank Neubelt, Poland 2027)
138ft Prout (China 2013) - bare hull only, never fitted out (second hull?)
139ft Mengi-Yay (Jaron Ginton L'Aquila II, Turkey 2021)
141ft Gouwerok/Balk Shipyard Urk (Juan Kouyoumdjian Yemaya, Netherlands 2026)
144ft Vitters Shipyard (Reichel/Pugh "project 3093" "project Magic", Netherlands 2024)
150ft Derecktor (German Frers "K-IV", USA 2008) - bare hull only, never fitted out
150ft Alu International Shipyard (Iñigo Toledo Ruiz, Paolo Scanu, Poland 2008) - bare hull only, never fitted out
152ft ATB Agadir (Gilles Vaton, Morocco 2014) - bare hull only, never fitted out
153ft TISG Admiral Yachts / TISG Perini Navi (Guillaume Verdier & Axel de Beaufort Art Explora, Italy 2023)
165ft Esenyacht (Dykstra & Partners Troy, Turkey 2015) - fitted out, never rigged
168ft Scheepswerf Made - Proteksan Turquoise (Dykstra & Partners Rainbow II, Turkey 2023)
177ft Graafship (NG Herreshoff Ingomar, Netherlands 2013) - bare hull only, never fitted out
177ft Gouwerok - Omikron/Olympic Yachts (Juan Kouyoumdjian & Rob Doyle Argo, Lavrio/Athens 2024)
196ft Perini Navi/Marina di Carrara shipyard (Ron Holland "C.2239" fourth sistership to Seahawk, Italy 2024) - launched 2018
212ft Royal Huisman (Dykstra & Partners "RH408" Aquarius II, Netherlands 2024)
222ft Vitters (André Hoek "project 3095", Netherlands 2026)
226ft Gouwerok/Vitters (Dykstra & Partners "foundation0" "project 3094", Netherlands 2025)
264ft Royal Huisman (Malcolm McKeon "RH411" , Netherlands 2028)
279ft Royal Huisman (Mani Frers "RH410" , Netherlands 2026)
462ft Dreamship Victory (Dykstra & Partners Dream Symphony, Turkey 2016) - framing only, never planked

<40m section

this out-of-date list needs attention, as it is very hard to track the buildlist accurately, especially with the constant rollout of the Turkish pinewood gulets. Therefore I don't think that the section adds much encyclopedic knowledge for that matter. Any ideas? signed:Donan Raven (talk) 01:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been around much to edit the sail articles for a few years, but I think you have done a fine job maintaining this article. Its a gift to sailors everywhere! Thank you, as for that section, it could be split off into another article or moved to an examples. Cutter12 (talk) 13:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for starting the article in the first place! I propose the following leader rewording, tell me what you think - signed:Donan Raven (talk, contribs) 10:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article lists active sailing yachts in excess of 110ft in sparred length.
Yachts operate under different maritime classifications and rules than other vessels and are designed for private use, but are usually offered for charter with a limited number guests (typically 12 invitees maximum). This list features vessels with sails which were classed as yachts when they were launched as well as vessels which were subsequently converted to operate with sails and re-classed as yachts.

Sounds fine! Cutter12 (talk) 12:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo column

might it be an idea to attach a photo column, similar to the list of large motor yachts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102Legobrick (talk • contribs) 22:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggested yesterday that the photograph column in the motoryachts list be removed; There are many blank cells in that article and there would be even more blank cells in this less prominent article. The small comparison table of this article has included photographs but they were removed because they did not serve for comparison well; Instead they are better featured at thumbnail size (180px by default) in the individual yachts' own articles.

However, yacht names in the first column of this article do feature links to Commons where files are available, see for example the IRC supermaxi Comanche (2014). This solution makes full use of the availability of the files without breaking the style or readability of the list - it is, after all, *just* a list. Tell me what you think. signed:Donan Raven (talk, contribs) 02:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

England/Scotland vs UK

I noticed that for several UK shipyards, the nation is listed as England or Scotland rather than United Kingdom. Is this a style choice, error or some sort of maritime convention? 128.16.10.70 (talk) 09:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't it be none of the above and still be correct? - wolf 14:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

A large proportion of the entries here are completely unreferenced. Of course, those with their own articles should be properly referenced there, so it is only one click away. But I do think that all others should have at least a basic citation. Heaven forbid that some entries are just made up, but stranger things have happened. I think that it is a convention on other ship-related lists (eg, List of ships named Foo...) that inclusion requires a ref. Thoughts? - Davidships (talk) 17:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]