Jump to content

Talk:List of exoplanetary host stars

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Missing stars

[edit]

It seems to me that some prominent stars are missing from the list, notably Fomalhaut. Is there a reason for the absence, or should I add it? Dotancohen (talk) 11:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The only claimed planet around Fomalhaut was imaged in visible light but further observations in infrared cast doubt on planet's existence. PlanetStar 20:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see, thanks. Perhaps these suspected stars should be included, with a footnote mentioning the doubt. Dotancohen (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This page only lists 723 planets. The NASA exoplanet archive shows 800 confirmed exoplanets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.156.41.220 (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fomalhaut b is now confirmed. --Artman40 (talk) 09:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kepler-47 is not listed and the link shows that it has two planets around it. This should probably be added though I don't know all the particulars. Perhaps someone else could add it? Dismas|(talk) 04:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Metallicity of Alpha Centauri

[edit]

Tcgriffen put down a metallicity of 13 for Alpha Centauri. That simply cannot be true... 68.32.39.206 (talk) 19:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple star systems

[edit]

Is it possible to add an indication if the star belongs to a binary or multiple star system? Stars like NY Virginis and Kepler-47 are binaries and the statistics are only for one of the stars. --Artman40 (talk) 09:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Split

[edit]

I've started a new list based on this one, which should be much easier to maintain: List of nearest exoplanets. It should be limited to 50 ly away. Feel free to help make that list complete. Nergaal (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add our Sun for comparition purposes?

[edit]

Wouldn't it be interesting for readers to have the sun included to compare the values in the table with those of our own star? I could try to add it, but I would like to hear your opinion about it first. --Snevern (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The mass and radius values are in solar units. Simply you can just add Sun with row of data to the top of the list for a full picture, but Sun should not be included here since it would contradict the title. PlanetStar 23:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was redirect. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 17:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This list is outdated and poorly maintained, and is almost identical in scope to the better-maintained List of multiplanetary systems (the only difference being that this list also includes single-planet systems). I propose redirecting this article to List of multiplanetary systems, and merging any content that's worth merging. An alternative could be to merge that list into this one, though I would prefer restricting the list to multi-planet systems to keep the size down. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 17:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect As far as I can tell, the last major update to this list was in May 2012(!) Updating it to today would probably require a multi-page-long list that would end up mostly being a duplicate of the chronological exoplanet lists. It's worth noting that even List of multiplanetary systems has a proposal dating from October to trim the list down even further by only including systems with at least three confirmed planets. Ionmars10 (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I agree with Ionmars10 - the List of exoplanetary host stars is poorly maintained and is unlikely to be improved in the future.Trurle (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would reccomend that the 2-planet systems be removed. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 03:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.