Talk:List of current boxing rankings

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Boxing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing articles

WikiProject Boxing "To Do":

→ Help pick the next article for collaboration.

FA Noms:

Review:

New:

Expand: Hasim Rahman | Gabriel Elorde | Gerry Peñalosa | Ike Quartey | Joel Casamayor | Jean-Marc Mormeck | Odlanier Solís | Yuriorkis Gamboa

Collaborate: Boxing

Discuss:

Annotate: Muhammad Ali | Sugar Ray Robinson | Oscar De La Hoya | Jack Dempsey | Rocky Marciano | Joe Louis | George Foreman | Roy Jones Jr. | Marvin Hagler | Lennox Lewis | Evander Holyfield | Manny Pacquiao | Érik Morales

Assess:

Create:

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of current boxing rankings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170104115343/http://boxrec.com/records to http://boxrec.com/records

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IBO

These rankings should be removed. Although I do somewhat rate the IBO, listing their rankings alongside the other four organisations gives a false impression that the IBO is on the same level. Which it certainly isn't. – ².O.^Boxing 17:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flag Representation

Since the removal of flag representation, I feel as though the article feels somewhat empty.

According to MOS:SPORTFLAG, "Flags should never indicate the player's nationality in a non-sporting sense; flags should only indicate the sportsperson's national squad/team or representative nationality"

Should we not match the flags with respect to the nation/subnation the fighters choose to represent or if not how the governing bodies has them listed?

Anlineoffline (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That would be indicating their nationality in a non-sporting sense. Professional boxers do not represent nations in an official capacity; the flags they wave around in the ring are personal preference and the sanctioning organisations list whatever passport the boxer chose to register with (Beterbiev is a prime example of that). – ².O.^Boxing 17:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IBO

Where has IBO rankings gone? 95.149.133.129 (talk) 05:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you don't think IBO is on the same level as the other sanctioning bodies it should still be on the page with boxing current rankings as it is definitely part of the conversation and is by definition still a boxing sanctioning body and arguably the least corrupt one that exists. Many boxing fans complain about the corrupt rankings in the WBA,WBC,IBF and WBO. Yet at the same time don't take the IBO seriously despite it being the only sanctioning body that has an incorruptible and unbribable computerised ranking system. 95.149.133.129 (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The IBO isn't one of the sport's four major sanctioning bodies nor is it well-regarded. It doesn't belong in this article. – ².O.^Boxing 15:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]