Talk:List of crossings of the Susquehanna River

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Mid‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Market Street

Someone had linked Market Street Bridge in Harrisburg, PA with the Market Strret Bridge in Chattanooga, TN. - rmgrotkierii 2006/02/18 10:30am EST

Crossings?

Where are the other Dams (Holtwood, SafeHarbor, etc.)? They may not be open to the public for crossing the river, but they certainly cross the river. And if we're going to list demolished crossings, there was a bridge between I-95 and Conowingo Dam, long ago. Where does the AT cross?--J Clear 00:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I like maps, so I ran Google and Topozone up from Conowingo and added the Dams and AT. I notice the area around the Rockville Bridge seems to be a veritable bridge grave yard. There is one obvious set of abutments just upstream. About 300m above seems like some awfully straight sets of rapids. 700m downstream appears to be another straight set of rapids. Then again, looking at the local topology, all but the first could be natural. ... Found some answers in the Rockvill Bridge article. And another obvious ruin north of Marysville, mentioned in the article.--J Clear 01:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently there is a low head dam near the Shamokin Dam power plant, below the Adam T. Bower Mem. Dam. I didn't add it yet. It doesn't show up on the topos. I only found it while looking for the Bower dam, which does show on the topos. It gets back to how do you define crossing. Is it something that would be noticed by a boater? Is it a way for a human to cross the river? Would that include fords?--J Clear 15:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm contemplating a Susquehanna Dams article to compliment this page, and remove the dams that don't allow people across from this list. The article would be useful to consolidate the impacts to shad and siltation of all the dams.--J Clear 17:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization?

Should the generic "Railroad Bridge" really be capitalized? I don't think it should be, unless there's a real name associated. I did the West Branch with caps only to be consistent. But I did put other types of generic crossings in lower case.--J Clear 00:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Data Ordering

The list starts out listing locations with the river right town first, then river left. I did the West Branch that way. Some of the New York entries seem to be listed the other way. For those who would have to look it up like I did, river right is the right side as you're facing downstream. So it sould be "Endicot and Vestal". Although, given that the list moves upstream, the NY order might make more sense. The simplest fix (Plan A) is to just change the NY entries. Plan B is to change all the others. Plan C, the toughest, but my favorite, is to reorder the list downstream (and fix the NY entries) so the list looks somewhat like a normal map orientation, at least on the lower river.

I vote for A in the short run and C in the long run (or when I find time to write some perl to do it).--J Clear 01:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've always ordered towns in an west-east or south-north direction, as that seemed to be a consistent standard used on the lists. It made sense to me since most lists focus on highway crossings and mileage markers go from west-east and south-north. As for ordering the list from mouth or headwaters or vice versa, the Mississippi River is the only one I know of that is listed from headwaters to mouth. It seems that mouth to headwaters is more popular because it places the larger and more notable crossings at the top, which are more likely to have Wikipedia articles. Just my 2 cents. VerruckteDan 03:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The current row ordering does have that advantage. I didn't even try to make any of the west branch crossings be links. Still, this is a very river centric list, and contains other than just highways, so I'm not sure how much highway conventions should hold sway. I'm more concerned that as the river swerves one way or another that you don't jump which side is listed first. The west branch practically loops, it starts out running west near Carrollton, then north, east, and finally south. There's at least one place where the town is in a loop, and I would have had to list the town first where the highway crossed into town and second where it crossed out, to meet the "mile marker order standard". Even a 90 degree bend in the river could do it. Does the Mississippi article have any discussion on this?--J Clear 20:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harrisburg

This should be mined for historical bridges near Harrisburg, but I don't have the time right this second.--J Clear 23:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fjording the Susquehanna?

Is anyone aware of areas of the river which would be crossable on foot without a (current) bridge, and without swimming--particularly between Marysville and Maryland? Surely there were shallow areas fjorded before the ferries were in operation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.156.66.4 (talk) 19:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean ford, not fjord :) It appears there were some: [1] --NE2 19:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of crossings of the Susquehanna River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060910155721/http://www.jcflyover.com/ to http://www.jcflyover.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]