Talk:List of countries by past and projected GDP (nominal) per capita

[Untitled]

Should not this article be renamed into "List of countries by past and future GDP (nominal) per capita according to IMF" or similar? Because that is what it really is. The same about other articles of this sort.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge List of countries by future GDP (nominal) per capita into this article. Mightymights (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

---

• Support Mightymights (talk) 21:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Order proposal

The order is silly and annoying, you cannot make comparisons by ORDER!, which is what is useful in this comparisons from bigger to smaller, someone should change a normal order like every serious statistic does.

Greenland appears to be missing

Is there a reason there's no data for Greenland? In theory GDP is available from the Nominal GDP page, and population from their country page, at least one year could be filled in with just the data on Wikipedia.

I'd add it, but I'm not sure how to edit tables and add rows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.118.196.162 (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

2018 IMF estimates incomplete

Where are the estimates for many of the African countries for 2018? Just a bunch of blanks... -- Darthdyas (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

seriousness of projections

The figures of projections seem a bit random. Poland would have 6% growth in 2019? I wish I could bet against that weird guess, that would be easy money. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.36.72.89 (talk) 11:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Sudan 2018 - 808, 2019 - 3999???

1960-1980

What are the sources for these figures?--Antemister (talk) 12:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

@Joseph Solis in Australia:, I found the source! Look at [1], a five-year-old revision. Later, the Refs were removed... Could you integrate them correctly?

Sorry, did not see that you did so just two days ago (forgot to post that for several weeks).--Antemister (talk) 22:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

But once again, the articles lacks the sources...--Antemister (talk) 22:49, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

The data is outdated!

IMF updated its database in April 12th.Now it is May,but the data hasn't been updated and is still 2015 version(except 2021).If someone has time to update it,the data could be more useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.104.4.60 (talk) 13:00, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

"Germany"

Maybe not anyone realizes that, but there was not one Germany but two between 1949 and 1990, and here most tables include only one Germany. @Joseph Solis in Australia:, did you investigate that?--Antemister (talk) 09:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

I agree, the data are imprecise and thus stupid. The economical wealth between FRG and GDR was extreme. So for a correct view, one should give three items: a) Germany b) Germany, West (FRG) c) Germany East, GDR

:: Centre for Economic and Business Research Prognosis

I laugh while reading the forecast for UK and Germany!!! UK will have a higher BNP than Germany -. after Brexit. I think the desire was the source of that thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.175.117.143 (talk) 10:39, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

no data between 2020 to 2035

and you live in the 20s of 21 century. Do you think this is proper? 77.179.106.121 (talk) 23:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)