Talk:List of cat body-type mutations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Cats Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The item above implies that polydactyl cats have opposable thumbs. This may possibly be true in unusual cases, but it is certainly not the rule. I don't know where this misconception may have come from.

Is there a reason cats seem to have so many more mutations than other creatures? I've heard of plenty more signs of genetic problems / advantages in cats: and the mutations tend to be far less harmful (such as extra digits, which it is believed can make them more agile / dextrous). Is it a problem of bottlenecking / controlled breeding by humans, is it just because there are more cats observed by humans, or is there something different about their genes? Perhaps someone with a better biology background could explain it / include it in the article. 122.49.146.159 (talk) 04:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Paws"

I was reading and came across this line: "Cats with the gene for RH should never be bred." I thought it might be more appropriate to say something to the effect of "It is widely believed that cats with the gene for RH should never be bred" instead to provide a more neutral (or at least neutral-sounding) standpoint. Thoughts? 69.169.132.45 (talk) 06:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twisty cats

I remember when the original uproar about the "twisty cats" came out, and the website for them very explicitly stated they were not intentionally breeding for the mutation. There is an updated page maintained by the breeder here: http://www.karmafarms.com/twisty.htm

The information in the article may be both incorrect and libelous, as well as unsourced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.233.132 (talk) 13:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to be more specific. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ^⊝כ^⊙þ Contrib. 11:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eyes

This article needs to cover the eyes, too, e.g. Odd-eyed cat. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ^⊝כ^⊙þ Contrib. 11:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cat body-type mutation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615125156/http://www.cat-world.com.au/Loci2.htm to http://www.cat-world.com.au/Loci2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-scope and expand

This should be moved to Cat body types and expanded to cover more than just unusual mutations, but all the standardized body types used in the cat-breed literature, including: cobby, semi-cobby, moderate, Oriental, lean/muscular, and large. Need to review breed standards and books to make sure all of these are the typically used ones (list ones that aren't as synonyms), and make sure any common ones are not missing. This information is basically of more encyclopedic value than "the weird stuff", since readers into cats are going to encounter the normal body type terminology much more frequently than they'll run into medical and genetic terminology for mutant conditions.

Presently, we appear to have nowhere to link these terms, and they're used over and over again at specific breed articles and at List of cat breeds. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 10:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spiders

is there any good reason that the bulk of the intro replaces "cats" with "spiders?" got a chuckle out of me but i don't think it belongs. UraniumsBrain (talk) 07:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]