Talk:Liquid-hydrogen tank car

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liquid-hydrogen tank car article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

It is requested that a mechanical diagram or diagrams illustrating {{{1}}} be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

It is requested that a vehicle diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Untitled

Maintaining a seperate article on a 'Liquid Hydrogen tank car' is redundant. The content of this article has previously been merged into Tank car. Recommend deletion of 'Liquid Hydrogen tank car' article in order to save on bandwidth. -- HarveyHenkelmann (talk) 22:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The merge is opposed as you noticed with the restoring of the page. Cheers Mion (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A seperate article on Liquid Hydrogen tank cars, is it really necessary?

Maintaining a seperate page for a subtype of Tank car is unjustified. The content can be easily included without causing unnecessary fuss for readers. HarveyHenkelmann (talk) 23:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i dont agree with you, as this type of tank car is unique in the discussion about a hydrogen infrastructure and hydrogen economy, as i said its not yet complete, its missing historical data, design schematics etc, maybe if i label it as a stub ? Cheers Mion (talk) 23:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

25 psi

Specify absolute pressure or gauge pressure? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.50.167.89 (talk) 23:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I can't find 25 psi in the cited reference but I have found 35 psi. Biscuittin (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont remember were that came from, maybe mistaken from this this [1], however as technology progresses, the psi's go up, 35 PSI is fine with me. Mion (talk) 15:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, 25 psi is in the ref. Biscuittin (talk) 17:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DOT 113A60W Insulated. Safety Valve (30 psi) (On Tank). Safety Vent (60 psi) (On Tank). Safety Vent (16 psi) (On Outer Shell). ,[2] a pdf from 2004, but the data might be older. Mion (talk) 16:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Biscuittin (talk) 17:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

I can't find "17.000" or "pound" in the cited reference. Also, it's a curious mixture - "17.000" is presumably European notation for seventeen thousand but "pound" is distinctly American. Most countries would now use kilogrammes. Biscuittin (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[[3]] "Railroad tank cars of 17,000 pound capacity are also in current use for transcontinental shipment of liquid hydrogen."Mion (talk) 16:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Biscuittin (talk) 17:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the image?

File:Linde-raix708a.jpg

This Linde...

Peter Horn User talk 02:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liquid hydrogen tank car. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090416065631/http://www.ika.rwth-aachen.de/r2h/index.php/Liquid_Hydrogen_Transport_by_Rail to http://www.ika.rwth-aachen.de/r2h/index.php/Liquid_Hydrogen_Transport_by_Rail

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]