Talk:Law of Papua New Guinea

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Papua New Guinea Top‑importance

	New Guinea portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Papua New Guinea, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Papua New Guinea on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Papua New GuineaWikipedia:WikiProject Papua New GuineaTemplate:WikiProject Papua New GuineaPapua New Guinea
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

British possession

No PNG was not a British possession under Australian administration prior to 1975. Legislation relating to PNG emanated from the Australian parliament. This crazy suggestion that Australia wasn't an independent nation or that it did not exercise full control of PNG up until at least 1972 has to stop. Please read the PNG Independence Act for one thing. Other matters... - I've never read anywhere that PNG contemplated having its own head of state. The wording of the constitution is not enough to justify the claim nor does the absence of the Queen on currency. In any case the constitution is pretty clear on the matter.

For the avoidance of doubt, it is hereby declared that— (a) in this Constitution— (i) a reference to "the Head of State" is a reference to the Queen and Head of State of Papua New Guinea for the time being and includes a reference to the person or persons exercising sovereignty over the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the event of the youth or incapacity of the person in that sovereignty;

I'm not saying it happened but if it did it needs a citation.

- The PNG constitution states "the principles and rules that formed, immediately before Independence Day, the principles and rules of common law and equity in England are adopted, and shall be applied and enforced, as part of the underlying law." The article states "this means decisions made by UK courts but That is to say, decisions of the High Court of Australia, the Judicial Committee of the Imperial Privy Council, not being part of the common law of England, and indeed of the pre-independence courts of Papua New Guinea itself are not part of Papua New Guinea law; but decisions of the House of Lords, the English Court of Appeal, the English Queen's Bench and other English courts up until Papua New Guinea's independence are." Okay maybe it does but again a citation is needed.Tigerman2005 (talk) 07:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For casual information, PRENTICE; The late Sir William Prentice and the late Lady Mary Prentice, former residents of Olympia Road, and pioneers of the native suburban garden, would be delighted that Prentice Park in Naremburn was opened in their honour by Mayor Pat Reilly on 18 August 2007. ^[1]

References

^ http://www.naremburnprogress.org.au/docs/naremburnMatters/200709%20Matters.pdf

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Law of Papua New Guinea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060903210710/http://bar.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/reform/reform80/05.html to http://bar.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/reform/reform80/05.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Port Moresby parliament building front, by Steve Shattuck.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Provincial government law entitled"law on littering from Moto vehicles on public roads

What is the purpose of this proposed law? 203.83.23.65 (talk) 01:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In which areas does the LLGs have ultimate Jurisdiction

In which areas does the LLG have ultimate Jurisdiction 124.240.214.86 (talk) 14:57, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any law at national level

About customs at border 103.25.143.143 (talk) 15:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.naremburnprogress.org.au/docs/naremburnMatters/200709%20Matters.pdf

[1]