This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Laurent Ulrich is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Because he took sides in a political dispute during an election, which is quite unusual. It's also demonstrates his attachment to an issue mush on the pope's mind. Similarly, the French church has been dealing with sexual abuse, so his views on that matter. Most of his other views are probably unremarkable, but something make come to our attention.
You've also misunderstood the meaning of cherry-picking. If this were are article about immigration and we included only arguments against and not argument in favor, that would be cherry-picking. That's about balancing sources. Balancing. You seem to be questioning significance, which I've answered. Rutsq (talk) 15:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
“Supports Reform of Church’s Stance on Sexual Morality” - ?
…does he? The article used as a source only mentions his desire to use friendlier wording. It offers very little substance to back up this claim, and so I don’t really think it’s a tenable argument. Theotherp (talk) 03:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
