This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
The part where "citation needed" is marked after the remark on its influence as of today, I guess that one could mention virtually any book on international law and there is bound to be a reference to Oppenheim's. From the pile of books that I have by me the book is mentioned in Dieter Fleck (ed.) The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008); Dino Kritsiotis, "International law and the relativities of enforcement" in James Crawford and Martti Koskenniemi (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), p. 245-268; Catherine Brölmann, The Institutional Veil in Public International Law: International Organisations and the Law of Treaties (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007); and I could go on and on but I got struck by apparent laziness. Hence, I do think that there is no particular need for a citation here nor is it missing. The only way to show its importance even today would be to account to all the scholarship that has found inspiration from the Oppenheim's in its numerous editions. Surely, it is no longer a standard textbook on the matters but it still deserves its place in the annals of international law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.232.112.207 (talk) 19:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
