Talk:Klymaxx

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Original release date of 'One Day'

The original release date of Klymaxx' last album One Day was May 17, 1994. I have the original CD in my collection. The re-release date was January 7, 1997.

Fair use rationale for Image:KlymaxxPromo.jpg

Image:KlymaxxPromo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Klymaxx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Klymaxx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Factually inaccurate and information that keeps being promoted by Thegooduser

There are label credits for Klymaxx songs that are false. There are original member names not included. The timeline of members being added is incorrect and is the same exact wording from Bernadette Coopers page. There is a reference to the “official Klymaxx website” that is fraudulent as it contains no one who ever sang on an original Klymaxx record. The word “official” has unfairly diverted traffic away from all other members. I see 60% of all external links to 1 person and Thegooduser suggests that I am biased for wanting to add correct info about other members. I’m not sure how this all works as I spend no time here but Seth Godin talked about “the deletionists” from this site on his Oct 3 podcast. The page also says that the history section has no history or sources so why is it there? It’s there because the deletionist has a bias toward incorrect info and likes it. Bios about living persons whose credits are attributed to someone else, then corrected, then deleted and replaced by the same fraudulent statements causes damage. JBreezy7 (talk) 01:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JBreezy7, I understand that you are probably frustrated that your hard work has been removed by me, I am not here to discourage you or stop you from editing Wikipedia at all, I am not here for that, You are more than welcome to add the information back if you cite a Reliable Source, and like I mentioned, please read The Conflict of Interest Guideline, and if you are receiving compensation for your edits You must disclose it on your userpage, Thank You, and I hope you will enjoy Wikipedia. :) Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]