Talk:Kitty Joyner

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kitty Joyner article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Kitty Joyner has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 21, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 10, 2019.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Kitty O'Brien Joyner (pictured) was the first woman engineer at NACA, the predecessor to NASA?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 11, 2020, and July 11, 2023.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Celebrating Women Scientists (2016)

This article was created or improved during the Celebrating Women Scientists edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in 2016. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

File:Kitty Joyner - Electrical Engineer - GPN-2000-001933.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Kitty Joyner - Electrical Engineer - GPN-2000-001933.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 11, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-02-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

Kitty Joyner (1916–1993) was an American electrical engineer with the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), and then the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). She was hired in 1939 as the organization's first woman engineer, shortly after she had become the first woman to graduate from the University of Virginia's engineering program.Photograph: NACA

Archive – More featured pictures...

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kitty O'Brien Joyner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Canada Hky (talk · contribs) 12:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am happy to review this article for GA status. I typically read through and make initial comments as I go, and then run through the checklist after everything has been resolvd or acknowledged. Canada Hky (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Canada Hky: Thanks! I can probably get to your comments below sometime tonight. For context, I started this article a couple years ago after I came across that great picture and wanted to learn more about the person -- and what it was she was standing in front of. :) A few days ago I revisited it and did another search for sources. What's here is exhaustive of what I could find. It's not a lot, but I felt like it was in good shape for what's available, having notability pretty solidly established. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great - I look forward to seeing how things progress. I think short articles can be good articles with no issue, as long as it is accurate and encyclopedic, so I have no concerns about that. Canada Hky (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review

This is a really interesting article. I recently finished reading Hidden Figures, and this segues nicely with that. A few introductory notes:

The lead accurately sums up the article, but could maybe place a bit more appropriate weight on some of her accomplishments. Being hired as the first woman engineer and being the first woman UVA engineer graduate are notable enough that they do not need to be forced into a single sentence.

expanded a bit. open to ideas for other ways to do so Done?

Some of the inline references need to be reorganized to be in sequential order. I started this, but it may be better served after any further tweaks to the article have been completed.

Done

For this statement "...but in 1937, women had not been admitted Engineering School despite a 1920 state law allowing it" - the cited reference supports the 1920 date, but does not say anything about women not being admitted as of 1937. Could an appropriate reference be found for that statement, and these sentences reorganized?

reworded. Done?

For the Miami News quotes - is the reporter's name available? It would be good for the citation and also as their thoughts are being directly used in the article.

Unfortunately not -- not that I saw, anyway. Here's a newspaper.com clip

The LMAL is abbreviated, but the abbreviation is never used again, so this can be removed.

Done

It is unclear from the text - is the Algernon Sydney Sullivan Award awarded at graduation or a later date?

Done

What is the Winnie Davis Award?

was harder to find than I would've thought but Done

Try to eliminate the one sentence paragraphs that are at the end of sections.

Done

@Canada Hky: Thanks. I think I've addressed all of the above that I can. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Great work - this article is a very well written biography.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
No issues, there is a public domain source utilized, but all is properly sourced and cited.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The image is excellent - I can see why it caught your eye. It was one of the reasons I snagged the article to review.
Overall: Thank you for developing this article, and putting the effort into improving it!
Pass/Fail:

Canada Hky (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with main picture

Somebody appears to have posted a naked lady. I seriously doubt this is the correct picture and is most certainly inappropriate to the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.161.175 (talk) 02:36, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The page was indeed vandalized a couple times, but the vandalism only remained for a few minutes (a few minutes too many, but still). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:32, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]