Jump to content

Talk:Kinki Sharyo SLRV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Confusion

[edit]

It needs to be made clear that the "SLRV" designation applies to the LRVs only following the addition of the low-floor section. The LRVs before the conversion had no original designation until the SLRV conversion contract was signed. This article should, therefore, focus on the LRVs as a whole, encompassing the entirety of its existence, including both pre and post-conversion. Right now it is biased towards the post-conversion design, but we cannot neglect that before that they were the first ever modern LRVs in North America. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The "first-ever modern LRVs in North America"? How do you get that? They weren't even the first low-floor LRVs (of the modern era) in North America; that notable distinction went to Portland's Siemens SD660s in 1996 (first entering service in 1997). And if you did not mean low-floor, then the first LRVs in North America were built almost two decades before Dallas's first LRVs: the first Boeing LRVs, in the mid-1970s. SJ Morg (talk) 13:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kinki Sharyo SLRV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]