Talk:Kent and East Sussex Railway

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	April 1, 2018

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. The editor who added the request suggests the following:

add a geographic map

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Kent and East Sussex Railway.

Fair use rationale for Image:Cts457.jpg

Image:Cts457.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Headcorn & Maidstone Junction Light Railway

I notice that there is no mention of this line, which did receive an Act of Parliament although it was not built apart for a short section at Tovil.[1] Would this line merit its own page? Mjroots (talk) 22:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have started a page, but need help with template. Mjroots 14:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

It has become clear that large sections of this article were probably directly cut and pasted from other sources. See the current diff. A lot of the article appears to have come from the Colonel Stephens Society website. Either they have copied Wikipedia, or Wikipedia had copied them. I don't know. I'll continue to rewrite the article over the next few days, and hopefully the issue will be resolved. Mjroots (talk) 06:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TRAMM201.jpg may be deleted

I have tagged File:TRAMM201.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 09:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling stock

Just wondering whether the reference to Lydd in relation to the Bodiam No. 3 Terrier should be a reference to Lydd Town or Lydd-on-Sea? Lamberhurst (talk) 12:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was Lydd Town. Mjroots (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Better if the and is replaced with &

Vandalism

Tenterden renamed Rolvenden Parkway in 1903? The SECR relieving themselves in the public toilets in Station Road? I'm too much of a newby to know how to fix just these without affecting the rest of the article, but someone should do it - this is actually a very good article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.152.20.43 (talk) 12:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Found a couple more: "Mixed trains ran until they felt less mixed" and "This is telling in itself as Colonel Stephens was renowned for liking children when he was alive."[reply]

Xth longest

"Once the K&ESR have re-instated 13½-miles between Tenterden Town and Robertsbridge, This would make it the Ninth longest preserved Standard Gauge railway in Great Britain." "This totals a distance of over 11½-miles in length (Making it the sixth longest Standard Gauge railway line in the United Kingdom as of June 2012)." This seems to be a contradiction, I've marked both statements as 'citation needed', though maybe they just need deleting if nobody has the citation to correct them? 90.206.228.23 (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kent and East Sussex Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kent and East Sussex Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927181407/http://monologues.co.uk/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=163&forum=Humorous_Monologues to http://monologues.co.uk/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=163&forum=Humorous_Monologues

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]