Talk:Kelvin Hughes
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Looks like it's the same company with different pages. This one here is the UK branch of the company. Should we just merge them? MediumFPS (talk) 09:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support. If there were a lot of sources cited here, I'd say no, but because this article is largely unsourced, there is no problem merging it (and drastically reducing it). If enough sources can be found to merit a stand-alone article, it can always be split out again. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose It has standalone notability as the company that co-developed medical ultrasound for obstetrics,see Ian Donald. There is plenty of references to support this. scope_creepTalk 17:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.