Jump to content

Talk:Kawasaki P-1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I am a user of a Japanese version.

Is the copyright in this photograph really GFDL?

Japan defense ministry Technical Research and Development Institute is forbidding reprint without permission in the photograph.

TRDI (Japanese)--210.131.1.48 13:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Info

[edit]

Added source no.1 and 2. Source no.1 allows non-japaneses speakers to understand the system too. Please understand that there are almost no sources of info in english. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.178.219.18 (talk) 04:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THanks for adding the sources, especially the English one. I understand there's not much in English, but we still have to have sources here, whatever the language. Good work. - BillCJ 06:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

All sources refer to plane ether as P-X or XP-1. That is including Japanese article. If any other name become popular or official, then we can consider adopting it, but not now. TestPilottalk to me! 20:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a name, but a designation. "P-1" is the basic mission and model number, with "X" being the status. And have seen it listed as just "P-1" in several sources, IIRC, and "P-1" is still in the article in at least 4 places. But it's not worth revert-warring over, as from past experience you're never wrong. - BillCJ (talk) 11:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nah. You seems to be right. At least the most credible source, Jane, http://www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jawa/jawa5548.html refers to the program as Kawasaki P-1 and to prototypes planes as XP-1. But in this case entry sentence and combo box should be fixed? TestPilottalk to me! 08:23, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved: insufficient support. DrKiernan (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Kawasaki P-1Kawasaki XP-1 – To reflect the name of the aircraft rather than the procurement program. Per Kawasaki Heavy Industries' own website: http://www.khi.co.jp/english/aero/product/airplanes/xp_1.html memphisto 12:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the XP-1 is only the prototype, if it doesnt go into production it may be appropriate but it is certain the series build aircraft will be P-1s. MilborneOne (talk) 18:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kawasaki P-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. Redalert2fan (talk) 12:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kawasaki P-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]