Talk:Karl Friedrich Becker
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Karl Friedrich Becker/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
==Rating explanation== This article meets all the guidelines for B. It shares the weakness of the article in DE: only based on one source, but that one source seems to pretty much duplicate what ADB has to say with more clarity. I think it strengthened that article by omitting some POV material. I rate it as high in importance since Becker's work is well known, at least historically. I'm not sure how well known he is known now in German encyclopaedias. It does not seem to be a stub to me because I don't think there is a lot more to be said based on what I've seen in German references. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 17:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 20:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)