Talk:Kalapani River

India: Uttarakhand / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Uttarakhand (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:INDIA Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this merit an article?

I have two questions. First, who outside WP actually calls the stream below the Kalapani temple and army post Kalapani River? Even if that seems like an excellent name for it, Wikipedia has a policy against promoting neologisms.

Second, shouldn't material about this part of the river be in Sharda River which also covers the mountain/hill part called Kali in Uttarakhand and Mahakali in Nepal? Even though it isn't calledShar(a)da until the Terai in U.P., we don't have separate Kali and Mahakali articles because of shifting names; we only redirect.

Likewise we don't have one article for Kali Gandaki, another article for Narayani (mainstem in Nepal) and a third article for the Gandak after it enters India. We don't have a Koshi (कोशी) article for Nepal and a Kosi (कोसी) article for India. We don't have one article for the Arun in Nepal, a second for the Bum Chu in Tibetan usage, plus a third one for whatever the Chinese call it now. Instead Wikipedia seems to have a de-facto policy of single articles with redirects for rivers with shifting names

The main exception I can think of is Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet and Brahmaputra in India/Bangladesh, Then I suppose there are historical reasons because it was only suspected that they were the same until the expedition of Frederick Marshman Bailey in 1913. Nevertheless WP doesn't actually have a separate article for the Dihang or Siang as the river is called in Arunchal. Instead Siang points back to Brahmaputra. LADave (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalapani River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041127060040/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDQ/is_2000_Jan_3/ai_58533253 to http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDQ/is_2000_Jan_3/ai_58533253

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalapani River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070314133605/https://www.cia.gov/cia//publications/factbook/fields/2070.html to https://cia.gov/cia//publications/factbook/fields/2070.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]