Jump to content

Talk:Kōji Kitao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kōji Kitao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kōji Kitao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write of article, specifically "Downfall" and "Sumo coaching role"

[edit]

Hi anyone who reads,

Me and a few other people have been saying for a while that this page really needs a re-write because of the order and method it presents infomation in: specifically, in the "Downfall and expulsion" section, it says that Kitao stormed out of an argument and hit his stablemaster's wife on the way out. However, in the "Sumo coaching role section", it mentions that Kitao returned to the sumo world because the stablemaster whose wife he supposedly hit had retired due to illegally pocketing stable funding, and that "most of what was alleged to have taken place between Kitao and Sojō was made up by the latter." This essentially implies that Kitao did not strike the woman, and also calls into doubt many other things he was accused of.

The issue is that these two facts are spread out in the article, with the accusation of hitting a woman coming near the start, but the refutal coming close to the end. I've seen many cases of people who assume that the guy was a woman beater and a bad yokozuna and never get as far as reading the later section on the fact his stablemaster wasn't exactly a paragon of virtue himself (illegally pocketing stable funds) and that according to the source, many of the accusations against Kitao were made up by said stablemaster.

The article should be rewritten to make this clearer, spefically having it mention that many of the things he was accused of were seemingly made up by someone who himself was expelled from sumo and was rumoured to be involved in other things (Yakuza involvement, stealing rikishi bonuses, etc.). Kitao sounds like he was a difficult person to get along with for sure, but it seems clear he was unfairly expelled from sumo; the Kyokai wouldn't have let him anywhere near a heya again even unofficially if what he was accused of was true, but it seems like people weren't willing to admit they were wrong the first time round.

If no one else is interested in doing it, I'll have a go at the rewriting when I have the time and post it here before I update the article.

Cheers. Hidenotora (talk) 10:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I briefly added a small section link to the relevant part of the article for now that describes this accusation as being probably made up, which will hopefully be enough for now. I do think the section needs rewriting though. Hidenotora (talk) 12:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]