Talk:Joshua Broome

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 20 July 2024, see discussion.
soft delete, 23 February 2022, see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Money He Earned From the Industry

Does anyone know whether he gave back the $1.1 million he earned from the industry? It’s a valid piece of information to include in the article.Les Whinin (talk) 20:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't imagine he would "give back" money he earned. I don't know how it would be a "valid piece of information" if he didn't. He probably spent it on life expenses, moving back to Carolina, buying a house, wedding, etc. EytanMelech (talk) 00:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s valid because he’s essentially saying that he was wrong to work in the pornographic industry, given that he believes now that the pornography industry is bad. Therefore, if he consciously chooses to withhold the money he made working in an industry he himself considers vile, then he’s a hypocrite.Les Whinin (talk) 02:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's your opinion, and you're entitled to it, but I think that would fall under W:ORIGINAL since that is information you are synthesizing yourself. EytanMelech (talk) 02:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can agree, even if we agree on little else, that I wouldn’t be the sole person drawing such a conclusion about this individual. However, given that such a point does fall within the realm of W:ORIGINAL, I will relent on it here. Nevertheless, the issue was worth raising even it was going to be dismissed justifiably.Les Whinin (talk) 02:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]