Talk:Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Goggins Mountain was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 June 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Edits

Folks, can we please run our edits through a spell-checker before posting them? It's not that hard. Honest. Also, I will continue to add mention of negligence by AmerenUE if it is removed. It doesn't have to be legally declared by a judge to be obvious, and I have the FERC report listed as a reference. Also, I refuse to join some wiki group just to edit or comment, unless this is enforced by Wikipedia itself (at which point I would obviously have no choice). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.199.5.6 (talk) 08:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AmerenUE

To the folks who keep removing the reference to AmerenUE's negligence: Do you work for them? Clearly, mentioning a detail that is referenced on another page is not uncommon - I invite you to read the page for Bhopal, India. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.199.5.6 (talk) 21:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can we discuss this rather than unilaterally nuking one another's edits?

I quote this interesting snippet from the page on edit wars, which someone recommended I review once again:

"In general, communication is the key to avoiding conflict: follow Wikipedia:Editing policy#Talking and editing. Once it is clear that there is a dispute, avoid relying solely on edit summaries: discuss the matter on the article's talk page. The primary venue for discussing the dispute should be the article talk page, which is where a reviewing admin will look for evidence of trying to settle the dispute."

So, can we (and by we I mean people other than myself) engage in some discussion here? I must admit to thinking the argument used so far is somewhat specious, and have the feeling that my edit is intruding on someone (who is obviously well connected in the community, since I have never seen this much interest in this page) and their pet Wikipedia project, and that my version of this page does not agree with their master plan for their little corner of the wikipedia universe that they have claimed for themselves. Other than that, I'm not really sure what the problem might be. My edit stood for a year before being removed. I hope I'm not being cliched, but my edit contains the fifth "W" of the reporter's creed, namely "Why?". The article mentions the flood ("What"), it's an article about the Shut-Ins ("Who"), it mentions the date ("When"), geographical location is part of the article ("Where"), but it lacks a strong "Why". The cause is mentioned as a reservoir failure, why it failed is of much greater interest. My edit provides a direct link to the FERC report, and adds an almost inconceivably large sum of 7 words to the article, and one reference. To those who look upon Missouri state parks Wikipedia pages as their dominion - can you cut me seven letters of slack?

In any case I don't pretend to be the master of the English language, but can we try to do a little better when posting? I giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are acting in haste to remove my unconscionable seven-word edits, but please try to pay attention to what you are posting. I don't care how it sounds when it comes out of your mouth, but the word "but" is rarely if ever surrounded on both sides by commas. "Settlement" contains three of the letter "e". Funding a 52 million dollar restoration with 180 dollars does not make sense.

Can we talk about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.199.5.6 (talk) 09:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comma and $$ fixes. The article is about the state park and it mentions the dam disaster with a link to Taum Sauk pumped storage plant article where the details are fully discussed. To assess blame and add other details here would be in violation of WP:WEIGHT, simply not needed. Please assume good faith of your fellow editors and don't make accusations here. Vsmith (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties

Did the park superintendent pass away in this accident? The sentence about the causalities reads very strange. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kd626 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update?

"A new campground is expected to open April 30, 2010." It's 2012... did it open? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.86.189 (talk) 15:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151221233953/https://mostateparks.com/sites/default/files/Jan_Dec_2014_Attendance.pdf to http://mostateparks.com/sites/default/files/Jan_Dec_2014_Attendance.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]