Jump to content

Talk:John McAslan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

John McAslan + Partners

[edit]

I think this section needs to be removed and maybe created as its own article. It looks like a coatrack otherwise?Theroadislong (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was thinking the same myself, so yes.--ukexpat (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broken infobox

[edit]

I've removed this as a) it was a mess and b) there didn't seem to be any useful info in it anyway! Does anyone feel strongly about reinstating a non-broken version? Architypist2 (talk) 06:47, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John McAslan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI Editing

[edit]

Lots of edits here are by John Mcaslan + Partners, and Hufton and Crow, both organisational entities. I have reason to believe other major contributors are related to the subject. It's quite puffy in places and I think the whole thing needs reviewing on the basis of the above. I'll make a start, starting conversation here for anyone else who's interested! JeffUK 11:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, agreed. Loads of poorly sourced promo fluff now removed. Axad12 (talk) 19:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]