Jump to content

Talk:John Catron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

old talk

[edit]

John Catron, is a confederate.... n ot a unioon party off -- 15:30, 17 October 2005‎ 209.158.178.70

How many Supreme Court Justices were there?

[edit]

Something in this article doesn't make sense. The article says that the Supreme Court was expanded in 1836 from 7 to 9 justices and Catron was the only one of the two appointees who accepted the post. Then when he died, in 1865, according to the article, Congress eliminated his seat taking the Court back to 9 from 10. But how did it get to 10? 208.11.92.3 (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dodgy February 1857 Buchanan letters

[edit]

The letters he exchanged with president-elect Buchanan in February 1857 were ethically dubious (violating principles of executive-judicial separation), and would have caused a big political scandal if they had been known at the time. As it says at Dred Scott v. Sandford#Influence of President Buchanan, "Both by present-day standards and under the more lenient standards of the time, Buchanan's applying such political pressure to a member of a sitting court would be regarded as highly improper." There should be more on the letters, but I've at least added a bare mention of them... AnonMoos (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Catron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]