Talk:Jet d'Eau

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Why do we need a citation on seeing the fountain from 10 km up? I've seen it myself, as can anyone flying into Geneva. You can even see it on Google Maps, it is awesome. I am removing the "citation needed" thingy. --WiseWoman 12:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Attribution. "I've seen it myself" is not a good enough source for a fact to be cited in Wikipedia. --Mathew5000 17:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A 5 year old's grasp of mathematics should be enough to prove you can see it at that distance. - 0.14KM large object at 10KM away ~ can you see a 14cm object 10 metres away? Furrycushion (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A 140m long object from a distance of 10km would have an angular diameter larger than the moon (half a degree). Even allowing for the shape of the fountain (it is not a disc), and having a viewing angle of 45 degrees downwards, say, giving a distance of around 14km, I would be surprised if the fountain is not visible from 10km up under a wide range of viewing conditions, particularly given its motion and contrast of the water spray against the relatively dark water background (when sun direction is appropriate, eg no specular highlight is on the flat water). Under ideal conditions far smaller objects are visible from cruise altitude (eg a bus on a road). For more information, read an article on visual acuity, vision, airborne survellience, search and rescue, or just get on an aircraft! :) What citation could be provided? Perhaps a scientific study showing that 9 out of 10 passengers with window seats were able to see the fountain on a particular day? Any photo could be dismissed as not being representative of human vision. 159.153.156.60 09:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

PLEASE add citations to this article if you have any. I came here to clean up the several-month-old uncited tags, but if I do, there won't be much of an article left. Please add cites to anything tagged that you want kept. Alvis 04:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that the sign next to the Jet d'Eau says that water is being pumped to an altitude of 140 meters. However, I have to admit I doubt this number. I live in Geneva and have gone to the Jet d'Eau many times and I have never seen it being that high. Of course my vision could be wrong, but if one assumes that a person standing next to the Jet'd Eau is 1.80m , then the water would have to be almost 80 times the height of the person. And I'd say it is roughly half that number. Is it possible that the height of the Jet'd Eau varies and that it only reaches maximum height under certain conditions? If so, the paragrpah should be changed to "Five-hundred litres (132 gallons) of water per second are jetted to a maximum altitude of 140 metres" (Timoluege 14:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Simple mechanics lets you calculate that a projectile launched at 200kmph would reach a maximum height of 157.7m in the absence of air resistance, so a height of 140m is sensible. The figure of 200kmph is widely documented... - Zephyris _Talk 16:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted the "citation needed" reference in the trivia section since the volume of Lac Leman (88.9 billion cubic meters) and the flow rate of the jet (0.5 cubic meters per second) are known, making this statistic calculable by trivial arithmetic. 85.1.180.131 16:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Overzealous "citation needed"

Removed the citation needed tag for the quantity of water in the air at any time, this is trivial mechanics to calculate.

Many of the other statements are easily supported by a Google search for "Jet D'Eau", I have added references for three statements from the first Google result. In the future try to find references, not simply mark them as "citation needed". - Zephyris _Talk 15:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turned Off at 1.00pm

Since 2003, the fountain has operated during the day all year round, except in case of frost and particularly strong wind

For at least the last 2 years, the fountain has been turned off regularly at about 1.00pm Geneva time. I've see this happen every time I've been to the airport and, to start with, joked that it was turned off when I wasn't there. It's like clockwork and doesn't seem to indicate bad weather. Of course, this might actually be rare but more and more friends have noticed this (the UK flight times mean driving past at 1.00pm.) I've seen the Jet d'Eau from height and it's easily seen but I've never approached Geneva airport from 33,000 and so can't say whether it's visible or not from that high up.

DrATty (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jet d'Eau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121201123533/http://www.ville-geneve.ch/monuments-lieux-interet/patrimoine-monuments/jardin-anglais/ to http://www.ville-geneve.ch/monuments-lieux-interet/patrimoine-monuments/jardin-anglais/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]