Jump to content

Talk:Jesus Is Lord

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJesus Is Lord has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starJesus Is Lord is part of the Jesus Is King series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 15, 2020Good article nomineeListed
November 24, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 4, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Kanye West used an extended version of his track "Jesus Is Lord" under the title of "Every Knee Shall Bow" for his film Jesus Is King?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Jesus Is Lord/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 23:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


For helping me getting "Cups" to GA. I am going to review this! I do have some homework to do so I'll finish the review by tomorrow. :) The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Boss The bot has finally updated things but it has been a while since you opened this review and nothing has been done, any updates on this? --K. Peake 07:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
    2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

The Release and reception has grammar issues. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Are you sure the source lists it as Gospel? The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Boss Thank you for the review and yes, the bot did deliver the message but your ping came through too. As for the source, it mentions the song as one of the three gospel tracks on the album. About the grammar issues too; I have fixed what I can see and can you point out any remaining issues if they are present now? --K. Peake 16:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    1. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  1. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  2. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  3. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  4. Overall

user:Kyle Peake, I'm pinging you just in case the bot does not work. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

user:Kyle Peake, everything looks good!  Pass The Ultimate Boss (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk11:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Kyle Peake (talk). Self-nominated at 08:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • This is a newly-promoted GA, and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. This is your fifth DYK, so a QPQ will be needed next time. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]