Jump to content

Talk:Jeff Crouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

[edit]

I'd argue the Sundance inclusion is notability enough. The YouTube triptych generator is arguably "a significant new concept, theory or technique" in use by many and included in exhibitions. Will add this recent article in ArtForum - http://www.artforum.com/inprint/id=20915 Ok to remove notability warning?

The New Frontier exhbition was an official part of the 2008 Sundance Film Festival [1] and goes some way to meeting WP:CREATIVE. So, yes, I'm OK with removing the notability tag.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeff Crouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UPE

[edit]

The article is fluffy and contains puffy contents that are not sourced. Moreover, the article was started showing the subject's DOB, but did not include a source, suggesting the creator was working off of materials not published. Graywalls (talk) 08:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

undisclosed paid editing

[edit]

This diff accuses the creator of the article, User:Dronthego , who self-identifies as Steve Lambert of being paid to write an article on Jeff Crouse on 26 April 2008‎, almost 13 yeas ago. At the time, Crouse was a Senior Fellow at Eyebeam [2], where Lambert was also a Senior Fellow [3]. They collaborated on a project, A.B.S.M.L. in 2008. They obviously knew each other at the time, but I see no evidence that Lambert received remuneration for creating the article. I'm removing the {{Undisclosed paid}} tag. Vexations (talk) 12:41, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough, based on what you said, I'm replacing it with COI. Graywalls (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ha! I can confirm I was not paid, for what it's worth. 🙂 I was working on a wikimarathon to add artists to wikipedia (there weren't as many 13 years ago) and added a bunch of artists and artist spaces I thought were notable but absent. Thanks y'all! Dronthego (talk) 17:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]