Talk:James Merrill

James Merrill was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 19, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

New York City C‑class Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry C‑class Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Good article nomination failed

This article lacks citations and references. Furthermore, the article could be made a lot easier to read with better partitioning of headings/subheadings. Really though, any stylistic criticism would have to wait, because without references, things are unverifiable. Futhermore, because of the language of the introductory sentence (which should be expanded), it sounds a bit less than NPOV. This article, with some work, should pass GA status easily, but I regret to say it isn't ready for that yet. Chuchunezumi 04:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Black Swan

The link to his "The Black Swan" takes us to a different novel. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by T3gk (talk • contribs) 05:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The two periods of Merrill's poetry

The article ought to address more clearly the break between Merrill's pre-Ouija Board lyric poetry and his obsessive metaphysical quest in "The Changing Light at Sandover." These two bodies of work are each important and influential in different ways, and the turn from one to the other is the defining feature of his career. I added a sentence to the article's introduction characterizing his work in this way. Llajwa 23:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JamesMerrill.JPG

Image:JamesMerrill.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

references

This article needs more references to allow for the verification of informationMrathel (talk) 18:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merrill Foundation

I suggest creating an article on the James Merrill Foundation and listing the recipients of the grants there. The long list of awardees is not appropriate for the James Merrill article, even in the ref section. Span (talk) 23:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This list is inappropriate in this article. Jpcohen (talk) 04:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection, the list wouldn't belong in that article either. I would suggest either deleting it or creating a list article of recipients, if the list is comprehensive and can be referenced. Span (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I created a new article, Ingram Merrill Foundation, and transferred over that increasingly cumbersome list of Ingram Merrill award recipients with Wikipedia entries. Believe me, I didn't set out to build a monolith and was surprised myself to see one emerging; in any event, I appreciate your advice in making the list more reader-friendly if possible. — Sandover (talk) 12:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Biography 2015

Suggested additions to articleOceanflynn (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hammer, Langdon. James Merrill: Life and Art. Knopf. p. 912.
"American poetry: From love to grief to gaiety: How a poor little rich boy became a great poet", The Economist, 18 April 2015, retrieved 22 April 2015

Photographs

Elisa.rolle

I reverted the addition of images because they made the page way too busy and throws off the other images and quotes. In addition, they were inserted mid-paragraph. There should be a separate line for the files, with the paragraph starting at the beginning / left margin of the page.

The only possible option is adding these images in a gallery, if that's ok with the contributors to this page.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Works sections using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]