This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
I'm not sure what is supposed to be indicated by the odd formatting in the bibliography section. It appears to all be done using the {{citation}} template, which for some reason is adding all these dashes or whatever. I don't recall seeing this done this way before and I find it very odd and unhelpful, but thought I would post here before trying to change it in case there was some reason for it that I am not aware of. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean the "----; title" thing? The line represents "same [author] as above", similar to how some formats use "ibid" to mean "same work as previously cited", I believe. I have no objection to a change in the formatting (in fact, I don't think I've even edited this article, and I have no idea how it ended up on my watchlist...wikipedia is weird), but the current format isn't something I haven't seen occasionally, though mostly in paper bibliographies and not on wikipedia. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:40, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
