Talk:James Allsup

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Allsup article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

This article was nominated for deletion on July 21 2016. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment by Chadason

This is an inaccurate wikipida page. The first paragraph is opinionated and non-factual leading to Wikipidia to be viewed as a company to be untruthful.

Not only is James Allsup a conservative, but he had repeatedly said that he does not believe in the far right, that the far right is beyond the scope of sanity, and that he bares no relation to their views.

This Wikipidia page is slander in a every legal sense of the word. Wikipidia can be held liable for such criminal acts. Please fix the opinionated portions to fit the facts. To protect Wikipidia. Chadason (talk) 23:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is an inaccurate wikipida page. The first paragraph is opinionated and non-factual leading to Wikipidia to be viewed as a company to be untruthful.

Not only is James Allsup a conservative, but he had repeatedly said that he does not believe in the far right, that the far right is beyond the scope of sanity, and that he bares no relation to their views.

This Wikipidia page is slander in a every legal sense of the word. Wikipidia can be held liable for such criminal acts. Please fix the opinionated portions to fit the facts. To protect Wikipidia. Chadason (talk) 23:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chadason and welcome to Wikipedia. The introduction to the article specifically states "Allsup has been described as white supremacist. He has stated that he prefers the term "American nationalist." As a seemingly brand new user to Wikipedia, I strongly suggest you try and edit less contentious areas first. As well, please be aware of our no legal threat policy. Forming consensus requires quite a bit of understanding of Wikipedia policies and it is hard to do for new users. Try checking out our Wikipedia:Community portal and gain some practice editing first. The previous consensus discussion took a long time to form, is a year old, and would need a very good argument to over turn. Please check out the previous disucssion before trying to propose a new lead. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was Chadasons 2nd and last edit. Doug Weller talk 15:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chadson is correct that the implications of this abstract are that James is a Nazi and white-supremacist. Of course, since these claims are unestablished (the SPLC is notoriously unreliable), there is zero reason to put these implications forth and revert to the null that he is not. NikolaiSKarkaroff (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jelte Wicherts citation and Improper Implications

Firstly, I'd like to acknowledge that Wicherts is obviously a credible source and a good researcher but the context in which this article discusses his 2010 response to Richard Lynn is flawed because it implies (and directly states) a claim that is controversial and unestablished (plus ignores all the evidence in favor of Lynn including from Lynn himself). (will add more once done source fetching) 07:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NikolaiSKarkaroff (talk • contribs)

The first paragraph

I read the now-archived discussion on the first paragraph and I don't see how it reflects consensus. Reliable sources (and many different ones, at that, including Fox Business News) refer to Allsup as a white supremacist. I'm particularly in agreement with Grayfell's point - Why are we using euphemisms like "far-right" in the opening sentence? I'm making an edit where I'm basically re-wording what's already there. JimKaatFan (talk) 15:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

James Allsup on air.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]