A fact from Jakarta History Museum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Why is this project rated low in importance? What's the background of deciding this article to be 'low' importance? The building can also be said as one of the first administrative center of Batavia, the city that would be Jakarta. Who decided to give this a low importance anyway? >:(--Rochelimit (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to change the importance scale to medium based on comparing this article with other Indonesian article e.g. Mount Papandayan which receives a medium importance, and I don't think Jakarta History Museum is 'lower' than that article, both in terms of the weight of the article and the number of texts (information) --Rochelimit (talk) 23:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
