Talk:Jacqueline Priestman

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 May 2022. The result of the discussion was merge.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Physics: Biographies

	Physics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
	This redirect is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Articles for Deletion debate

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Owen× ☎ 00:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry if I'm getting this wrong, but having proposed this for deletion, had the tag removed (but with the note that it is reasonable to have another afd debate so long after the previous one) I assume I am supposed to explain why I think it should be removed here.

So like I said, firstly there is inadequate evidence that this person existed, or that the phenomena she is alleged to have produced are genuine (all references go to one newspaper aticle) secondly that it is scientifically not credible and thirdly that the content is nonsense - what is the 'normal amount of electricity in the human body' how do you measure it in order to say somebody has 10 times the amount? 80.193.82.66 (talk) 15:06, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete was I supposed to do that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.193.82.66 (talk) 14:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]