Talk:Italian battleship Ammiraglio di Saint Bon

Italian battleship Ammiraglio di Saint Bon has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Italian battleship Ammiraglio di Saint Bon is part of the Battleships of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 15, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
September 11, 2015	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian battleship Ammiraglio di Saint Bon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 10:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to this after one of Storm's I've already taken. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox checks -- no dab or external link issues.

Prose/structure/coverage/referencing -- copyedited a fair bit, let me know if any issues; everything else seems fine.

Supporting materials -- images marked free and that looks correct; be good to take care of the US (and non-US) licensing warning tags...

All up, good work as usual. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:47, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article, Ian. Is there anything that needs fixing? Parsecboy (talk) 18:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no, meant to close it earlier -- passed. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]