Talk:Ion track
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Comments by Reimarspohr
[edit]Expanded article "ion track" as suggested. New article "ion track technology" in preparation to be linked with article "ion track". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reimarspohr (talk • contribs) 10:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted reference "Engelmann" and expanded article "Ion track". Reimarspohr (talk) 15:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Irony called out
[edit]From the article:
- At present, the field of microtechnology is expanding toward nanotechnology (note the ironic use of the word "expanding" here).
This seems unimportant to the article. Should it be removed? In my opinion, it goes beyond what's needed to explain the concept.
Just a thought.
Jpwilliamsofcali (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Ion track. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080313081908/http://www.gsi.de:80/forschung/mf/Service_e.htm to http://www.gsi.de/forschung/mf/Service_e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)