Talk:Intuitor

This article was nominated for deletion on January 15, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Early Web History (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Early Web History, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Early Web HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Early Web HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Early Web HistoryEarly Web History articles

Discussion of article's notability

I feel this article should not be deleted, this person came up with the idea of hexadecimal time. I feel it's a valid form of time. If anything the most this should be is a stub of hexadecimal time, with out this article there would be no up to date information on hexadecimal time. 142.166.19.53 07:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Chris Steele[reply]

I think this article should be deleted. The statement that "this person came up with the idea of hexadecimal time" isn't true. Hexadecimal time was first proposed at least as far back as 1863. The statement that "with out this article there would be no up to date information on hexadecimal time" is also equally false, as an entire Wikipedia article is dedicated to it and features far more relevant information than is present in this one.

Even outside of that, I can find no justifiably good indication or source for why Intuitor--cool and neat though it may be-- should be considered notable enough to have its own Wiki article. MechanoidWarhead (talk) 05:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources from AfD

"Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics" has been covered on All Things Considered ([1]), referenced by BBC News ([2]), and recognized by PC Magazine ([3]). Tim Smith 02:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]