Talk:Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organising this article in 2020

Thanks to @Amigao: @Mandarax: @Mk270: @Frodo.mintoff: for developing this content. Can I suggest that we build out further material, going off some of the benchmark articles for trans-national and intergovernmental entities, such as ASEAN or even NATO. That would probably mean: 0. Expanded introduction that mentions: statements of purpose (such as from the founding chairs) details on the secretariat. 1. History and context: explaining why founders felt it was necessary, who joined and when. 2. Members and partners: not just the table of people, but also what the connected associations are. 3. Plans and views: this would be an expansion on the purpose with statements on topics such sovereignty for democratic nations and universal human rights. The Little Platoon (talk) 21:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This seems to fail the NPOV policy, where it seems to be an advertisement for the group, with plenty of photos that has to do with conflict between China and the West, rather than the IPAC group itself. It also present points of view such as "military occupation of Tibet" and "Chinese expansionism" as factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.29.8 (talk) 14:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per [[MOS:PERTINENCE], we are supposed to "strive for variety" in choosing our images. This does not mean strictly limiting the article's images to images of the group or its direct work, as for example "[i]f an article on a military officer already shows its subject in uniform, then two more formal in-uniform portraits would add little interest or information, but a map of an important battle and an image of its aftermath would be more informative." Likewise, it may make sense to include images on the page that pertain to to the geopolitical conflict that this organization takes a stake in.

Regarding NPOV, we should add a section on China's response to provide balance. I will try to write one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikehawk10 (talk • contribs) 08:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]