Jump to content

Talk:Independent Soldiers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Citations

[edit]

Where did this info come from? Is it all OR or are there atribuable sources?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Macutty (talkcontribs) 05:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No this article is not original research. The article has 42 cited sources today. If you think the article is in need of further clean-up, please consider adding the appropriate clean-up template tags and messages to the article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Independent Soldiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bulleted citations removed

[edit]

This article had a lot of bare URLs in the "References" section. I've converted most of them to inline footnotes/proper citations, but the following I have not, which I'm including here as they may prove useful for article expansion by other editors:

[1] [2]

References

  1. ^ "Brace for gang war, police warn". The Vancouver Province. 23 October 2006. Archived from the original on 6 November 2012. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
  2. ^ "Man slain week after jail release". The Vancouver Sun. 21 January 2008. Archived from the original on 5 November 2012. Retrieved 10 November 2019.

--Doug Mehus T·C 01:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of events section

[edit]

Per Bold, Discuss, Revert, I have re-added the whole section of this article that an IP user deleted, in good faith, as it contained useful information, and I'm disputing that removal as, crucially, the added sources helped to establish XfD closer Britishfinance noted in their closing rationale of the deletion discussion for Independent Soldiers (which Bf noted as a WP:HEY to me). I appreciate all of the edits done by the IP editor, and other editors, since the AfD close. The revised article is still better organized, but I think the individual events are all helpful. You can, of course, feel free to further refactor my == Timeline of events == section, if you wish. Thanks also to Dimitris N.anagnostou for re-adding the deleted infobox. --Doug Mehus T·C 19:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Errors

[edit]

Article is poorly written, lots of errors needs proof reading. 2001:56A:7309:6A00:F539:5C7D:92CF:F8CC (talk) 08:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider using clean-up messages to identify where the article is poorly written, contains errors or needs proof reading. Or be bold and consider copyediting the article yourself! Unfortunately, not being specific about problems means it is difficult to address the issues you raise. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Are you on the slow side? People who submit these articles need to take responsibility and do some proof reading or not bother submitting such poorly written content. 2604:3D09:497B:D360:CCA4:9E:2536:FE1A (talk) 08:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WOW

[edit]

Please never write another article on Wikipedia, this is embarrassing to say the least. 2605:B100:745:DFC:0:12:327B:9B01 (talk) 10:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]