Talk:IOTA (technology)

Computing: Software / CompSci Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Cryptocurrency Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article IOTA (technology), along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Advert response is invalid

The Advert template should not be used. When factual design specifications do not appeal to a specific editor/editors, this does not legitimize the removal of factual information in the context of design implementation. Design information can not be claimed as an advertisement, design information is a factual section which contains specifics, and conceptual information regarding the existing implementation.

If there is a specific sentence, which we can come to consensus as being: "Written as an advertisement", then it should not be included. Removing entire 13 subsections, under the guise of 'being written like an advertisement' can be seen as censorship by special interests.

Sephirothika (talk)

WP:NPOV Language

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented.

The 'Microsoft partnership scandal' appears to violate WP:NPOV. Specifically, no where in the sources does it mention this being a 'Scandal' as denoted in the section title. Additionally, neither source for the passage 'The Iota Foundation was derided' state this.

This section appears to be WP:N however unless sources are corroborate that this was a 'Scandal' it is quite literally WP:NOTSCANDAL. Similarly the Foundation was not derided, as per those sources. Please update sources or reword that passage as this is WP:NOTSOAPBOX.

Note: I have a WP:COI so requested the edit.

Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2018

This edit request to IOTA (cryptocurrency) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Market cap

Dear all,

As of now, the market capitalization of the IOTA technology is about $6 Billion.

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/iota/

The fact that those three editors:

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:DGG http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Amakuru http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Timotheus_Canens

have decided to remove the IOTA wikipedia page yesterday is very disturbing.

Could the page be restored as soon as possible?

Best,

M. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micatlan (talk • contribs) 20:43, 24 April 2018‎

Semi-protected edit request on 4 March 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please pardon my mistakes in formatting.

The use of the word 'abused' in the original is grammatically incorrect, suggesting the DDoS attack was abused. The suggested change clarifies the cause and effect.

Please change

During the seed generator scam, a DDoS network attack was abused leaving initial thefts undetected.

to

Early in the seed generator scam, a DDoS network attack distracted IOTA admins, leaving initial thefts undetected.

Oshiri (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks!.