Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Ginny

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Ginny has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 18, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Todo

[edit]

Not quite B class. The prose and structure is decent, but the info is a bit lacking. Good job so far, though. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move

[edit]

An admin needs to move this to Hurricane Ginny (1963). CrazyC83 (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneJuliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Ginny/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanefan25 (talk · contribs) 14:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • "After approaching North Carolina, Ginny looped to the southwest and approached the Florida coastline within 50 mi (80 km)" — That sounds a bit strange; I think a better wording would be "Ginny looped to the southwest and approached within 50 mi (80 km) of the Florida coastline"
  • "The system initially moved generally northward, attaining gale force winds on October 19" — add a hyphen between "gale" and "force"
  • "The hurricane continued paralleling the coast of the Southeastern United States" — Sounds a bit strange, using the word "paralleling," but not a big deal.
  • "The rainfall was beneficial across the region,[1] ending a 28 day drought.[17]" — add a hyphen between "28" and "day"

That's it! HurricaneFan25 22:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got all of them but the paralleling. I do like that wording, personally, since "paralleling" is the gerund form of "to parallel", which is a perfectly legitimate verb. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fine with me! Passing. HurricaneFan25 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead suggestion

[edit]

I think the lead should include what year this storm occurred in, because looking at the infobox may not be intuitive. Perhaps:

Chris857 (talk) 01:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good call! I can't believe I forgot that. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]