Jump to content

Talk:Hoylande Young

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hoylande Young/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 12:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  • there would be value in explaining what Iota Sigma Pi is.
  • the ANL should have initial caps for all words
  • worth mentioning she was survived by her sister.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • University of Chicago is overlinked
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  • the Chicago ACS bio says she was a consultant between 34 and 38, but the article says she was unemployed?
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
  • there is no image, but the Flickr one linked at the bottom appears to be 2.0. I would think it could be used.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Placing on hold for seven days for comments to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 13:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Passing GA, well done.[reply]