Talk:Hot Rod (2007 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Information requires more verification. Danny 00:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

holy shit i thought this was just a joke! awesome. 69.220.0.55 03:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC) hey —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 96.4.127.20 (talk) 14:23, August 20, 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Word missing in plot summary?

What does Rod contemplate in the forest? Suicide? Buying a new car? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.85.81 (talk) 23:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the same thing ChesterG (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The money it grossed on retals is overly stated. It says that made 422 million. That's didn't happen. Or it needs a citation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.231.204 (talk) 22:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

quotes section

The Quotes section seems a bit unorthodox for a Wikipedia article. Looks to me like a bunch of Hot Rod fans just wrote down some of their favorites. I've never seen a quote section designed like this... -tbone (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hot Rod (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070811212114/http://www.hotrodmovie.com/ to http://www.hotrodmovie.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed or average reviews

Metacritic says reviews were "mixed or average" that's a direct quote. Yet somehow this article said it had "generally mixed reviews" which is not a phrase that Metacritic uses (and as far I recall has never used). There was even a quote in the wiki source claiming that this misquote is "CITED TERMINOLOGY, DO NOT CHANGE!" and from a brief look at the history of this article it seems to have been this way for years. I'm going to correct the text so that it does not misquote Metacritic. -- 109.78.201.233 (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I traced both the warning and the misquote back to 2014 and a single large edit that extensively rewrote the article.[1] Someone that actually liked this film might want to check that edit didn't introduce other more subtle mistakes. BTW, if you check using the Web Archive you can see that "generally mixed" was definitely not a wording that Metacritic used in 2014 it was "mixed or average"[2] then too, and it was "mixed or average" in 2010.[3] -- 109.78.201.233 (talk) 11:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]