This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
A number of different editors have contributed entries to the table. As is often the case, some of those entries are not all in the same format. For consistency, I am making some changes to bring things in line. For example:
Some years had the sports in alphabetical order, others had a different order. I think the best option is to have them all in alphabetical order (with the overall, DII and DII and other awards below in each section for a year)
Some entries use a full spelling of a school, e.g "Princeton University" while others used a common shortcut, e.g. "Princeton". I've opted for the shortcut, but anyone who thinks there is a possibility of confusion is free to add an appropriate link.
Most years have the winners in one column, and the other nominees in another column. There were a couple situations whether the winner was also repeated as a nominee. Technically correct, but redundant, and I have opted for the first situation, trusting that people understand the winner was also nominated.S Philbrick(Talk)21:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We also had some inconsistency on the handling of DII, DII and Inspiration awards, which I cleaned up. That did lose the runners-up for the overall award, but that can be added if someone wants itS Philbrick(Talk)14:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
