Jump to content

Talk:Herschel Greer Stadium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHerschel Greer Stadium is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starHerschel Greer Stadium is part of the Nashville Sounds series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 26, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 13, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 6, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
April 6, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
March 1, 2020Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Meaning of the stadium's name?

[edit]

GA review

[edit]

Generally very good. No issues on comprehensiveness and the article is well referenced. The issues I have are minor:

  • The prose mentions an expansion to 18,000, but not a decrease in capacity. The capacity listed in the infobox is 10,052. When did it change?
 Done: I can't find out exactly when this happened (approximatly the mid-to-late 1990s), but I added this after the part about the 18,000: "Over the next decade, many sections of seating beyond the right field wall and along the third base line were replaced by picnic areas, drastically reducing the stadium's seating capacity to just over 10,000." -NatureBoyMD (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • should keep the stadium functional for another three to five years is crystal-balling, even when referenced. Something like "intended to keep the stadium functional..." would be better.
 Done: Reworded -NatureBoyMD (talk) 16:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "It is currently home to the Triple-A Nashville Sounds of the Pacific Coast League (PCL) and can seat 10,052 fans." - You can attend a baseball game without being a fan.
 Done: Replaced all but one instance with spectators, in attendance, etc., or just left the number. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "As one of the oldest stadiums in the league, it now falls well below the standards set for a Triple-A stadium by organized baseball." This doesn't parse. "by organized baseball?" "Triple-A" could do with explaining too.
 Remark: I did some slight rewording to this part, but I'm not sure if it will make much difference. It now reads: "Greer is one of the oldest stadiums used by Triple-A teams, and it now falls well below the standards set for a Triple-A stadium by organized baseball." Changed it again: "Greer is one of the oldest stadiums used by a Triple-A team, and it now falls well below organized baseball's standards for a stadium at that class level." Let me explain some of that... "Triple-A" is the team's competition level, it is the highest level before Major League Baseball (this term is linked [earlier] in the article). "Organizaed baseball" refers to Major League Baseball and its affiliated minor leagues (the term is also linked). So, "organized baseball" has set standards for baseball stadiums based on their competition level. Greer does not meet the standards for Triple-A stadiums. I'm sorry if this seems too simplified or if it makes it even more confusing. Will that sentence work better? -NatureBoyMD (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wording that a little confusingly, using one sentence where I should have used two. Your alterations have improved it and it is no longer an issue. Oldelpaso (talk) 08:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "and is now showing its age" - too informal. Taking it literally, surely it has always been showing its age.
 Done: Removed the phrase quoted above (both instances) -NatureBoyMD (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lots of redundant instances of "also" or "in addition". In most cases the meaning is unchanged if they are removed, here is an example edit
 Done Removed all but one instance of "also" where it fits, and all "in addition"s. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:DASH, scorelines should have endashes.
 Done: -NatureBoyMD (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Baseball terms such as "bleachers" should be wikilinked.
 Done: I linked "bleachers." -NatureBoyMD (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The images all look to have valid fair-use rationales, but given that there are two decent free-use images in the article, four fair use images is quite a lot. I'd consider removing one of them.
 Done: I took out one fair-use image illustrating an event at the stadium. That leaves three fair-use images that depict the stadium itself. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 16:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • A general comment rather than something to fix, but the stadium is referred to as being old or aging on several occasions. 30 years doesn't sound that old — this weekend I visited a 130 year old stadium, and looking at the article for the only baseball stadium I've heard of (Yankee Stadium), it was built in 1923.
 Remark: I know, 30 years isn't that old for a stadium. However, consider that it was built for a team one class level below the current team (Double-A) and that it was evidently built as cheaply as possible. Here is a video from a Nashville news station about the stadium's problems. [1] By the way, do you think it would be a useful external link to add to the article? -NatureBoyMD (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A few issues, but they are minor ones in an article with an overall high standard, which should be easily fixed. I am therefore putting the nomination on hold. Oldelpaso (talk) 08:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I beleive I have appropriatly addressed the issues you raised. Let me know about bullet #4 and any other issues you find. Thanks for your review! -NatureBoyMD (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've passed the nomination. Good work! Oldelpaso (talk) 08:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Similar images / captions

[edit]

Is it necessary to have very similar images of the "unique guitar-shaped scoreboard", as described by the identical captions? Redundant, in my opinion. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the caption needs to be changed, but I believe the images are needed in both sections. The first instance supports the addition of the scoreboard in the narrative history of the ballpark. The second instance is there as a visual as the text gives more details on the unusal board. NatureBoyMD (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Herschel Greer Stadium which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://nashvillesounds.shutterfly.com/
    Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]