This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Please note that this section is essentially original research. While the New York Times article mentions both Herrenknecht and the Iranian nuclear program, this article makes no connection between the two. And certainly does not speculate as the criticism section does. 2A02:A451:8B2D:1:859A:89E8:28A7:B99D (talk) 17:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And it was too much for you to use the article talkpage to explain your deletions until now, instead of edit-warring and harassing other editors who were restoring what they was assumed to be a claim with a citation?--Mr Fink (talk) 17:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Warning other editors is not hounding or harassing. It's nice that the assumed tht this was a claim with a citation, but then one should also assume that these editors check the citation as well as the claim before reverting/re-adding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A451:8B2D:1:255F:D375:6CD0:8B17 (talk) 23:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]