Talk:Her Majesty's Wizard
Appearance
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 July 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to A Wizard in Rhyme. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insanity?
[edit]"Any student of Catholicism will quickly see their studies reflected in the lives and actions of the characters." Has Wikipedia been taken over by christians? This article needs to be seriously rewritten to adhere to quality standards. This is not a objective summary of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.166.11.82 (talk) 07:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Not notable?
[edit]This series is not Harry Potter which spawned movies, but it is a worthy endeavour at fantasy fiction, married with real-world literature and religion. Snowybeagle (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Notability's guideline is too subjective and too narrowly interpreted. Many articles on fantasy novels such as Terry Brooks' Landover series could be considered as lacking references and notability under certain interpretation. Snowybeagle (talk) 02:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- So you don't deny the article fails to meet the criteria, but instead claim the criteria are at fault? Incredible. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- No intent to explain to IP addresses. Snowybeagle (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Well then perhaps you'll explain to me. I'm an unrelated editor who found this edit war via WP:AIV. Please explain why this article is notable, and do not discriminate against IP contributors. elektrikSHOOS 07:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Put in my reasons in AfD talkpage.Snowybeagle (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)